Mayor Menino on Chick-fil-A: Stuff it

Vows to block eatery over anti-gay attitude

Mayor Thomas M. Menino is vowing to block Chick-fil-A from bringing its Southern-fried fast-food empire to Boston — possibly to a popular tourist spot just steps from the Freedom Trail — after the family-owned firm’s president suggested gay marriage is “inviting God’s judgment on our nation.”

“Chick-fil-A doesn’t belong in Boston. You can’t have a business in the city of Boston that discriminates against a population. We’re an open city, we’re a city that’s at the forefront of inclusion,” Menino told the Herald yesterday.

“That’s the Freedom Trail. That’s where it all started right here. And we’re not going to have a company, Chick-fil-A or whatever the hell the name is, on our Freedom Trail.”

Chick-fil-A has been swept up in a growing national controversy over company president Dan Cathy’s remarks questioning gay marriage and lauding the traditional family.

Chick-fil-A did not respond to multiple requests for comment. But the company released a statement yesterday saying it has a history of applying “biblically-based principles” to managing its business, such as closing on Sundays, and it insisted it does not discriminate.

“The Chick-fil-A culture and service tradition in our restaurants is to treat every person with honor, dignity and respect — regardless of their belief, race, creed, sexual orientation or gender,” the statement read. “Going forward, our intent is to leave the policy debate over same-sex marriage to the government and political arena.”

But that isn’t cutting the mustard with Menino. He said he plans to fire off a letter to the company’s Atlanta headquarters “telling them my feelings on the matter.”

“If they need licenses in the city, it will be very difficult — unless they open up their policies,” he warned.

In February, Northeastern University balked at Chick-fil-A’s plans for an on-campus eatery after students squawked about reports the chain’s charitable arm donated millions of dollars to anti-gay groups.

Undeterred, Chick-fil-A — which boasts 1,600 eateries, including two in the Bay State — has been scouting the Hub for new locations and is reportedly eyeing a lease at 1 Union St., across the street from City Hall, the Holocaust Memorial and historic Faneuil Hall.

The Purple Shamrock said it’s moving out when its lease expires in mid-September because of a 60 percent rent hike, according to a spokesman for owner Glynn Hospitality Group. The bar has been there for 32 years.

The 1 Union St. landlord, Steven Binnie of Carlisle Properties in Portsmouth, N.H., said he has no deal with Chick-fil-A and declined to discuss potential tenants. “I don’t know anything about the controversy,” he said.

Menino blocked Walmart from a Roxbury development last year, criticizing the retail giant’s impact on neighborhood businesses and lower-wage workers.

Now it looks as though he may try to do the same to Chick-fil-A.

“It doesn’t send the right message to the country,” Menino said. “We’re a leader when it comes to social justice and opportunities for all.”

Read the original story at Boston Herald

Bizarre: Anti-LGBT Org’s Video Offers Puzzling Take on Marriage Equality

CitizenLink, a self-proclaimed affiliate of the anti-LGBT group Focus on the Family, has a unique video out mocking President Obama’s support for marriage equality. The group seizes on unfounded fear tactics to somehow claim that the President’s support – as well as the majority of Americans who support marriage equality – equates to nothing more than a police state. Check it out:

 

See the original post at HRC.org

Gay Couple Eyes Lawsuit After Finding Pic on ‘Hate Group’ Mailer

Original engagement party photo of Brian Edwards and Tom Privitere.

 

Brian Edwards and Tom Privitere, a New Jersey couple married in 2010, were horrified when a photo of them kissing at their engagement party was altered and turned up in an anti-gay unions mailer 2,000 miles away.

The playful photo had been posted on Edwards’ personal blog and was originally set against the backdrop of the New York City skyline.

But the doctored photo showed the gay couple standing in a snowy Colorado setting and was used in a political campaign to attack a Republican who supported civil union legislation.

The tagline for the ad, which was sponsored by Public Advocate of the United States, was: “State Sen.Jean White’s Idea of ‘Family Values?’” White later lost the primary.

Ad sponsored by Public Advocate of the United States.

Now, with the help of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the couple and photographer Kristina Hill are threatening to sue the organization behind the ad and its president, Eugene Delgaudio, if they do not stop using the photo.

“Our initial reaction was complete shock,” said Privitere, 37, who works in entertainment ticketing and lives with Edwards in Montclair, N.J. The couple has been together for 12 years.

“We were heartbroken to see that our picture that was taken to represent love and family, and our values, and to share with other LGBT couples, was used for complete opposite purposes to induce fear and spread hate and bigotry,” he said.

Public Advocate, based in Falls Church, Va., is on the SPLC’s 2011 hate group list. It never had permission to use the photo, according to Hill, who runs her own wedding photography business.

Delgaudio, who is head of the board of supervisors for Loudon County in Virginia, told ABCNews.com that he has not yet received SPLC’s letter and is “looking into the matter.”

“I am searching whether or not we have the photo,” he said. “I have not commented on this ever and I have no statements on it. … Someone could do this without my permission — but I am working on it.”

Public Advocate, a grassroots advocacy organization, claimed that “thousands flock” to its website and called the Southern Poverty Law Center a “prehistoric dinosaur.”

“I have no idea what that means,” SPLC lawyer Christine Sun told ABCNews.com.

She said Public Advocate has 10 days to respond to her letter and then SPLC will make legal copyright claims for Hill and state law privacy claims and infliction of emotion distress on behalf of Edwards and Tom Privitere.

“Beyond a lawsuit … we decided to get involved because these actions are truly reprehensible — to take a personal photo of the happiest day in a couple’s life and use it in a homophobic attack ad,” said Sun. “It’s demonizing, unfair and unjustifiable.”

The couple learned the photo had been taken without authorization from a friend who saw it in a mailer from Sen. White and called them in June.

“Our immediate reaction was to find out where it had come from,” said Edwards, 32, a college administrator. “We scoured the Internet and found an article in the Denver Post to find out more.”

“We went through the whole process of anger and heartbreak,” said Privitere. “And now that we are on this road, we are trying to get some justice not just for us, but for other couples.”

Christian Advocates Not Listed as Hate Groups

SPLC’s criteria for listing hate groups is based on those who “demonize” a class of people with “misinformation and lies,” according to Heidi Beirich, director of the SPLC Intelligence Project. Such groups include the Ku Klux Klan, anti-Semitic organizations, neo-Nazis and black supremacy groups.

“There are only a handful of anti-gay groups,” said Beirich. “We don’t list those who are against gay marriage or the Biblical prescription against gay marriage — only the groups that are engaged in demonizing propaganda and lies about the gay community and basically lying about them to make them pariahs.”

Previous campaigns by Public Advocate include:

 A fundraising letter asking recipients to “imagine a world where police allow homosexual adults to rape young boys on the streets?”

 Comparing same-sex marriage to bestiality.

 Suggesting having gays as Boy Scout leaders is “the same as being an accessory to the rape of hundreds of boys.”

 Characterizing campaigns to stop anti-LGBT bullying as “requir[ing] schools to teach appalling homosexual acts … force private and even religious schools to teach a pro-homosexual agenda.”

“I use colorful language and hyperbole, but when I say something like, ‘Keep Obama away from your children,‘ I am not stupid, I know it’s hyperbole,” said Delgaudio.

“We definitely have 2,000 photos and in the neighborhood of 80 to 100 videos on my website, and if someone doesn’t want us to use it, we take it off,” he said. “We seek permission or we take the stuff off that’s not in the public domain.

“This may be the first objection in 30 years,” Delgaudio said. “Frankly, we are not distributing this photo and I’d be hard pressed to find anything today. Mostly, this an attack on me from previous statements I’ve made.”

As SPLC waits for or a response from Public Advocate before the threatened legal action, Edwards and Privitere hope the incident is a teachable moment.

“We want to use this as an opportunity to educate people and show them that a gay couple can and do have loving relationships,” said Edwards.

“This sort of thing has a trickle-down effect,” said Privitere. “I think of all the closeted gay high school students who got mail that day and felt disheartened that they would never have a family and the parents on the fence about whether to accept their gay child for who they are. That hurts.

“These people are spreading lies, and I want them [recipients of the mailers] to know they have our support,” he added.

Read the original story at Good Morning America

Anti-Gay Group Plans Google Boycott: ‘This Is Going To Be A Tough One’

Google has launched a new international initiative called Legalize Love to promote safer conditions for gay and lesbian people in countries with anti-gay laws on the books. Naturally, the American Family Association is now considering a boycott of Google products.

On their radio network, the AFA’s Buster Wilson decried Google’s gay rights campaign, which plans to start its focus in Poland and Singapore before expanding to other countries. Right Wing Watch has the video:

If the AFA thought boycotting Oreos was tough, wait until they start trying to avoid all Google products. As Wilson notes, anti-gay boycotters would need to ditch Gmail, Google Calendar, YouTube, their Android phones, and the search engine itself. “It’s going to be a hard one for a lot of us,” Wilson concedes, but it will “test the meat of our convictions.”

AFA will certainly need strong convictions because they are quickly running out of acceptable companies. If they plan to boycott Google, they would also have to add Microsoft, Nike, Time Warner Cable, Levi Strauss, CBS, and Xerox to their list — just a handful of pro-gay U.S. corporations. As more and more businesses realize the economic and social benefits of having inclusive pro-LGBT policies, the AFA’s feeble boycotting of Oreo cookies and Google products looks increasingly silly.

Read the original story at Think Progress

The 7 Most Anti-Gay U.S. Representatives

So far this Congress, anti-LGBT Republicans have introduced at least ten major anti-gay bills, resolutions, and amendments in the U.S. House of Representatives. While 144 Members of Congress have sponsored or co-sponsored at least one of the proposals, seven signed on to five or more of the pro-discrimination measures, a ThinkProgress analysis reveals.

The most anti-gay member of Congress has been freshman Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-KS). As the author of his state’s constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriages and civil unions, during his previous tenure as a state senator, his anti-gay fervor in Washington is not unexpected. In his first 18 months, he has authored an amendment to ban a directive that allows military chaplains to voluntarily solemnize same-sex unions, an amendment to “prohibit the use of funds to be used in contravention of the Defense of Marriage Act,” and a bill to ban the use of military facilities for any same-sex unions. He also co-sponsored three measures to criticize the Obama administration for not defending the Defense of Marriage Act, to direct the Speaker of the House to defend the law instead, and to delay implementation of the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell repeal.

Six other House Republicans have each put their name on at least five anti-gay proposals, putting them just behind Huelskamp:

  • Rep. W. Todd Akin (R-MO), a sixth-term Congressman who warned in 2006 that “anybody who knows something about the history of the human race knows that there is no civilization which has condoned homosexual marriage widely and openly that has long survived.”
  • Rep. Dan Burton (R-IN), a fifteenth-term Congressman who is retiring at the end of 2012 and who has previously opined that “Marriage between a man and a woman has been the foundation of human civilization for thousands of years all around the world.”
  • Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-GA), a fifth-term Congressman who has cited God as his reason for supporting an anti-gay constitutional amendment and who said in May “I don’t like the secularism that’s occurring in this country one bit and I think it is incumbent upon those of us [that] stand strong, to stand very strong, in regard to that and say ‘look, [my wife] and I believe that marriage is a sacrament.’”
  • Rep. Vicky Hartzler (R-MO), a first-term Congresswoman who was spokeswoman for the anti-gay constitutional amendment effort in Missouri and has compared same-sex marriage to pedophilia and letting three-year-olds drive cars.
  • Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-CO), a third-term Republican who came under fire for racially insensitive comments that associating with President Obama was like “touching a tar-baby.”
  • Rep. Donald A. Manzullo (R-IL), a tenth-term Congressman who recentlylost renomination after reportedly telling House Republican Leader Eric Cantor (VA) that the devout Jew was not “saved.”

Fourteen more House Republicans sponsored or co-sponsored at least four of the proposals. Just one Democrat co-sponsored any of the anti-gay measures — Rep. Mike McIntyre (NC), who co-sponsored a proposed constitutional amendment to anti-gay marriage. The other 143 anti-gay activists were all Republicans.

The House Republican leadership has also committed $1.5 million in taxpayer funds to defend the Defense of Marriage Act in court. While Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) has downplayed his party’s focus on social issues, preferring to talk about jobs, it’s clear where he and his caucus are really focused.

The anti-LGBT proposals were:

  • H.R. 337, the Restore Military Readiness Act
  • H.R. 875, the Marriage Protection Act of 2011
  • H.R. 958, the We the People Act
  • H.R. 3828, the Military Religious Freedom Protection Act
  • H.J.RES. 45, proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage
  • H.RES. 143, directing the Speaker, or his designee, to take any and all actions necessary to assert the standing of the House to defend the Defense of Marriage Act
  • H.CON.RES. 25, expressing the sense of Congress with respect to the Obama administration’s discontinuing to defend the Defense of Marriage Act
  • H.AMDT. 573 to H.R.2219, to prohibit the use of funds to enforce the directive of allowing chaplains to perform same-sex marriages on Navy bases regardless of any applicable State law requirements
  • H.AMDT. 546 to H.R. 2219, to prohibit the use of funds in contravention of section 7 of title 1, United States Code (the Defense of Marriage Act)
  • and H.AMDT.1096 to H.R.5326, to prohibit the use of funds to be used in contravention of the Defense of Marriage Act

Read the original at Think Progress

Homophibia

No, it’s not a typo. It’s a new word. My friend Giles Fraser, an extraordinarily clever English clergyman, invented it on Monday:

ho.mo.phib.ia | noun
Definition: the lies people tell in order to justify homophobia

And so he inspired me, not to invent a new word but to start a list — a list of the lies people tell in order to justify homophobia. Here’s what I’ve got so far:

“Homosexuality is unnatural.”

Actually, homosexuality naturally occurs in species ranging from primates to gut worms. Why a percentage of animals (including humans) express a sexual orientation toward members of the same sex isn’t clear. What is clear is that they do, which makes “homosexuality is unnatural” a homophib.

“Being gay is a choice.”

Another homophib. Regular-or-decaf is a choice. Chocolate-or-vanilla is a choice. Paper-or-plastic is a choice. Homosexuality is no more a “choice” than heterosexuality is. There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation, but there is a consensus that sexuality is a continuum. So the “choice” is not to be gay, straight, or somewhere in between; the “choice” is to build our own healthy relationships — and leave other people alone to build theirs.

“Homosexuality is a sin.”

Sins are acts that separate us from God and keep us from loving our neighbors as ourselves. Being gay is not a sin. Bullying is a sin. Being hateful to other people is a sin. Putting yourself in the place of God to judge others is a sin. Being gay is not. Saying that it is: homophib.

“But God clearly condemns homosexuality. It says so in Leviticus.”

Leviticus says that a man “lying with a man” is an abomination (Lev. 18:22). So is shaving (Lev. 19:27), gossip (Lev. 19:15), eating shellfish (Lev. 11:10), eating pork (Lev. 11:7), wearing cotton/polyester blends (Lev. 19:19), and associating with a menstruating woman (Lev. 15:19-20). The Bible is also clear that wives should be subject to husbands, that slaves should be obedient to masters, and that the Sun revolves around the Earth. For what the Bible really says about homosexuality, read Mel White’s What the Bible Says and Doesn’t Say About Homosexuality.

“Monogamy is antithetical to the gay lifestyle, which is characterized by promiscuity and sexual excess.”

The “gay lifestyle” is as characterized by promiscuity and sexual excess as the “straight lifestyle” is characterized by Hugh Hefner. There are gay couples who want to form lifelong relationships to love, honor, and cherish each other until death do they part, and there are straight couples who get married for 72 days to get ratings for their reality show. Gays can’t be monogamous? Homophib!

“Homosexual activists want to redefine the institution of marriage from the definition that God established at the beginning of time.”

The fact that you cannot sell your daughter for three goats and a cow means marriage was “redefined” long before homosexual activists got active working for marriage equality. What makes up a marriage are the values that bind a couple together in commitment to each other and to the life and family they build together, not the gender of the two people making up the couple. What we need is a protect-marriage movement that protects all marriages, and a family-values network that values all families.

“Same-sex marriage is an attack on religious liberty.”

This is one of the biggest homophibs of all. The good news is that the First Amendment protects your right to be as bigoted, homophobic, and/or sexist as you want to be, in the privacy of your own religion. The better news is that the First Amendment protects the rest of us from the bigotry, homophobia, and/or sexism of your religion. Seriously, people! Get off the “attack on religion” high horse and read the Bill of Rights!

So that’s what’s on my homophibia list: the list of lies people tell to justify homophobia. What’s on yours?

Follow Rev. Susan Russell on Twitter: www.twitter.com/revsusanrussell

Read the original post at Huffington Post or at Rev. Susan Russell’s blog: An Inch At A Time: Reflections on the Journey

 

Bryan Fischer’s Last Stand Against The Gays

Chris Ritter for Buzzfeed.

TUPELO, Miss. — The most famous man in Tupelo spends hours each day scrolling through his Google Reader, printing out articles, and stacking them by topic on his dark wooden desk in preparation for his afternoon radio show.

And that’s how the stunning news reached Bryan Fischer one recent Friday morning: Mitt Romney had hired an openly, proudly gay man, Richard Grenell, as his foreign policy spokesman.

“I felt it was a signal from Romney to the homosexual lobby, that you’ve got a friend,” recalled Fischer, the whose formal title is Director of Issue Analysis for the American Family Association.

Fischer sounded the alarm on Twitter: “Romney picks out & loud gay as a spokesman. If personnel is policy, his message to the pro-family community: drop dead.”

Fischer isn’t a Twitter native — he uses it as a broadcast medium, and follows only 26 people — but the clarity and confidence of his views is made for the medium. And that tweet was the spark that set elements of the religious right into an attack on Grenell, one that — in Grenell’s reported view, if not the Romney campaign’s — ultimately led to the staffer’s high-profile resignation and Romney’s first high-profile general election stumble. The story “just snowballed from there.”

“We got Romney’s attention with Richard Grenell,” Fischer said in an interview in his Tupelo, Mississippi office. “We spooked him. Scared him straight.” Fischer sat back in his chair, a picture of Elvis Presley gyrating his hips on the wall behind him.

Grenell’s departure, Fischer told the audience of his show on the AFA’s talk radio network, “a huge win” for religious conservatives.

The complex campaign flap and the massive publicity around it was also a huge win for Fischer, who has emerged from more or less nowhere — a 29-year pastoral sojourn in Idaho — to become the most visible and defiant figure on the embattled religious right. The unapologetic culture warriors of the 1980s — Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, and American Family Association Founder Don Wildmon, among others — have passed away or faded from the cultural landscape. A new generation of Republican politicians is more sensitive to the party’s libertarian strain, while a new generation of Evangelical leaders, led by the California megachurch pastor Rick Warren, has taken a step back from combative cultural politics.

But as other conservative leaders have sought to move with the times, Fischer has tacked in the opposite direction, toward strident and unapologetic attacks on homosexuality in particular. And as bluntly anti-gay rhetoric becomes associated with the fringe — with, in particular, the Topeka-based Westboro Baptist Churck and its notorious “God Hates Fags” signs — the 61-year old Fischer, may be the last out-and-proud anti-gay conservative still inside the Republican Party tent. Every Republican candidate except Romney visited Fischer’s show this year, and he regularly hosts Republican members of Congress. He has a key speaking slot at the Values Voter Summit every year, and the organization shrugged off Romney’s all-purpose denunciation of Fischer at last year’s summit as a speaker of “poisonous” language.

The Grenell issue was illustrative of Fischer’s new, leading role. Other voices on his side were notably more cautious, including even former presidential candidate Gary Bauer, who pointed out that gays were part of the Reagan and Bush administrations and stressed that “our concern is policy.” Other leaders only echoed what Fischer had started.

And with Grenell’s exit, Fischer scored his first real coup, and seems poised to benefit more from conservatives’ disillusionment with Romney than any of the evangelical leaders who have fallen into line with the Republican nominee.

“He’s fearless. He’s prophetic. He will stand on principle regardless of where the chips may fall,” said his friend and regular Focal Point guest Patrick Mahoney, the director of the Christian Defense Coalition. Mahoney said modern-day evangelical leaders “are much less prophetic and direct than Bryan.” Mahoney compared Fischer to the older generation of big-name Christian right leaders, like Jerry Falwell or Pat Robertson, but with an important difference: “Bryan understands getting the message out.”

Getting Fischer’s message out is now a large-scale production at the AFA’s Tupelo headquarters. Fischer hosts a two-hour radio show broadcast to hundreds of stations five days a week on AFR talk, plus a regular column and blog at the American Family Association’s website, a Twitter account, and increasingly regular appearances on CNN. This has also, of course, made him a target, something he doesn’t seem to mind. Comedy Central’s Jon Stewart recently showed a clip of Fischer Skyping in to a CNN interview, quipping “In case you’re wondering why he looks so blurry, it’s because his opinions are being broadcast from 50 years ago.” He’s declined to appear with Stewart more than once, he said, and declined an invitation to “talk about the message of Easter” with Stephen Colbert because he doesn’t think Easter is funny.

The cable exposure stems from Fischer’s eagerness to connect biblical narratives to contemporary politics, and his intense interest in the current presidential campaign. Fischer endorsed Rick Perry and described him as “as close as we were going to get to the whole package,” but switched his endorsement to social conservative darling Rick Santorum after Perry dropped out.

Fischer talks about Barack Obama as a menace to American national security, whose policies Fischer claims to have been baffled by until a video of Obama supporting a left-wing, African American Harvard Law Professor, Derrick Bell, re-emerged this spring.

“Is he just inept? Is he just incompetent? Or is this all purposeful?” Fischer asked. These were rhetorical questions.

“The conclusion I’ve come to is that he’s doing this purposefully because he believes that the U.S. needs to be punished for being a racist nation,” Fischer explained. “He is out to punish the United States for being racist.”

When Fischer is in the process of saying things that are likely to stir outrage, his voice becomes even more measured, more thoughtful, as you’d expect from a man who wanted to become a Bible teacher, and who knows that the truth is on his side.

Of liberals and moderates who accuse him of bigotry, he says: “The truth is not bigoted. The truth is not hate speech. And criticism is not hate, it is not hatred. Because if it is, then the left hates me. They’re bigoted. They’re prejudiced. They’re biased.”

Fischer also stresses that he has nothing but Christian love for gays. He draws the line, for instance, at Westboro Baptist, and denounced the group a decade ago in Idaho. Fischer says Westboro picketed his church back then for being “too pro-gay.”

But Fischer is perhaps the last blunt, outsider voice in the 20th century culture war tradition. And the most direct model for Fischer is Donald Wildmon, the radio host and United Methodist minister set up shop in Tupelo in 1977 under the banner of the National Federation for Decency. That group would become the American Family Association, and Wildmon is now its chairman emeritus; his son, Tim, took the reins in 2010.

Wildmon was, with Falwell and Robertson, a pioneer among the blunt and combative culture warriors. He directed his campaigns at the sexual revolution, forcing Sears, for instance, to withdraw its advertising from “Charlie’s Angels” and “Three’s Company,” and has remained an unapologetic champion of the Christian backlash against the gay right movement. When the Boy Scouts stood buy their ban on gay scoutmasters, he congratulated the group on its refusal “expose its young members to lonely sodomites.”

Fischer describes the elder Wildmon fondly as “the pitbull of the pro-family movement.”

Wildmon built a media empire out of a two low-slung brown buildings in a modest office park in Tupelo, a northeast Mississippi town of 35,000. The American Family Association now employs about 180 people and operates two radio networks: AFR Talk, and the larger music- and Bible-focused Inspiration network (or “inspo,” as the staff calls it), as well as putting out a magazine and other forms of outreach.
The grounds include a large room where engineers handle the machinery for the radio networks on plywood tables, and a chapel where the staff holds a daily morning devotional as well as a yearly phone-a-thon to raise money. A large replica of the Ten Commandments greets visitors before entering the main building.

Fischer, now by far the group’s best-known figure, occupies a small office in what the staff calls “leader’s corner,” near president Tim Wildmon. It’s enough space for a bookshelf, desk, and that photo of Elvis, who was born in Tupelo. Fischer isn’t a southerner, though. He was born in Oklahoma, the son of a minister. The family moved frequently, and Fischer spent his junior high and high school years in Fresno, California.

“My dad was the one who introduced me to a relationship with Christ,” Fischer said. “So I’ve always had a strong Christian faith.”

Fischer is over six feet tall, with intense blue eyes framed half the time by rectangular glasses and a shock of white hair. He favors button-downs with a slight sheen and dons a tie for his show, which viewers can watch on the Internet as well as listen to on the radio. On his left hand, he wears an ornate wedding ring, and the other hand bears his Stanford class ring (white gold, he noted). Fischer went to Stanford from 1969 to 1973 and was a in a fraternity; he recalls some frat brothers’ irritation at the popularity of the bible studies he led.

After Fischer finished at the Dallas Theological Seminary, the family moved to Boise, where Fischer led the Community Church of the Valley and ran the Idaho Values Alliance, an affiliate of AFA.

Fischer’s political awakening started in the early 1980s, he said, when he began listening to Don Wildmon and Focus on the Family’s James Dobson (the “lion king” to Wildmon’s “pit bull,” says Fischer) on the radio. Fischer decided “to penetrate the culture” and persuade Americans to return to traditional Biblical values, which he views upon the bedrock upon which our society is based. His target, like Wildmon’s, is the sexual revolution of the 1960s in particular, but Fischer’s particular focus has been the rising gay rights revolution. By the late 1990s, he had become the go-to spokesman for traditional values, objecting at one point to a quotation from lesbian tennis great Billie Jean King in Idaho’s new Anne Frank Human Rights Memorial,” and serving a controversial turn as chaplain of the State Senate.

“I’m absolutely convinced that homosexual behavior should never be normalized by rational thinking members of society,” he told BuzzFeed. “Therefore I will resist efforts to normalize homosexuality until the day I die because I think it’s bad for the country.”

And what of the drumbeat volume of accusations from those to his left — including many Republicans — that he is a bigot and a homophobe?

“It doesn’t bother me because I know I’m right.”

“Eventually everybody in America is going to agree with me,” Fischer said gravely. “Either before it’s too late or after it’s too late. Because what we’re talking about is the truth.”

Fischer’s confidence has made him a compelling messenger. In 2009, Tim Wildmon invited him nearly 2,000 miles southeast to work at AFA headquaters, and he and his wife Debbie moved to Tupelo. The couple attends the Hope Church, a midsize evangelical congregation on a desolate highway on the way out of town, and have two grown children, Jana and J.D.

When the younger Wildmon took over the AFA from his ailing father in 2010, he immediately set out to boost its already-robust radio network — an effort that involved hiring rising star Fischer. AFA’s programming goes out to 200 stations across the country and pulls in between 800,000 and 1.2 million listeners a week, of whom Fischer’s show takes the majority, the group says. Buster Wilson, who hosts the show after Fischer’s, said he believed Fischer had inherited the elder Wildmon’s high-profile role in the conservative movement.

“Bryan will say things that a lot of people on the conservative side of things think but they won’t say,” Wilson said. “Or believe but they won’t speak of,” Wilson said.

And the younger Wildmon, reserved and laconic by contrast with his exuberant staffer, seems comfortable that Fischer, and not he, now wears the father’s controversialist mantle. Though Fischer’s official title with the organization is “Director of Issues Analysis,” Wildmon said that AFA hired him primarily to helm their primetime radio programming.

And Fischer’s penchant for controversy has been good for business.

“He says things that are understood and misunderstood that generate extraordinary attention from the media,” Wildmon said. “I know he’s the favorite of Right Wing Watch. I think he pays their bills.”

Fischer does, indeed, feature regularly on Right Wing Watch, a project of the venerable liberal group People for the American Way. Kyle Mantyla, the senior fellow at PFAW who runs the blog, described Fischer in an interview as the “id of the religious right.”

“He says what he wants and doesn’t care about the consequences,” he said, adding that Right Wing Watch’s bloggers watch Fischer’s show every day and have written “hundreds” of posts about him.

Wildmon was careful to note that Fischer’s views, on his blog and on his radio show, do not always reflect those of AFA. He said there have been two instances in the past two years when he’s asked Fischer to take something off the site. One was a post asserting that Native Americans were “morally disqualified” from controlling territory in North America. Another was a column using the example of Magic Johnson’s health to question whether or not HIV really leads to AIDS.

Why can’t Fischer say that, but can say, for example, that Hitler was gay, or that God will cure AIDS if gays cease all sexual activity? Or that Bill Clinton is responsible for the rise in oral cancer?

“Most times his views are going to be be consistent with ours, but sometimes he’s going to stray and speak on topics that we wouldn’t get into,” Wildmon said. “I’m not distancing myself or our ministry from Bryan in the sense that he does work here, he’s on our payroll.”

Fischer said that every time something’s been taken off the blog, it’s been of his own volition.

“I made those decisions,” he said.

And Fischer is visibly in full control, and evidently unworried about controversy, as he settles down each afternoon to broadcast Focal Point. He sits at a central desk, surrounded by an iPad, a computer monitor, a clipboard, stacks of papers, and two copies of the Constitution. The studio also contains a monitor where he watches himself, and a large backdrop of the Constitution overlaid on American flag imagery.
The show runs from 1:00 to 3:00 in the afternoon, putting him in the same slot as Rush Limbaugh (“You know what the big difference between me and Rush Limbaugh is? Fifty million dollars a year,” Fischer jokes).

Fischer’s dissection of the day’s news is alternately folksy and professorial. He lacks the bluster of a Rush Limbaugh or a Glenn Beck, a quality that cushions his more extreme pronouncements. When a reporter visited him last Thursday, the first part of Thursday’s show focused largely on environmental issues. For example, melting sea ice, which “ain’t happenin’, folks.” Overpopulation is another myth perpetuated by the environmentalists, in Fischer’s view. “Get busy,” he told his listening audience before the commercial break. “Fill the earth. You know what to do.”

During one commercial break, Fischer accused the visiting BuzzFeed correspondent of thinking that his views on homosexuality were “archaic.” During another, he riffed on his admiration St. Athanasius of Alexandria, a third century Egyptian scholar exiled numerous times and then horribly martyred.

Fischer waited till a few minutes in to his show to mention the Grenell episode.

“I am for homosexuals,” he stressed. “I am anti-homosexuality.”

He continued: “I am not a homophobe. I am a homophile.”

As a true believer, his love the sinner, hate the sin position doesn’t ring false. But it doesn’t save him from being branded a bigot, something that other religious leaders like Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council or Gary Bauer have learned.

“Tony Perkins doesn’t say insane stuff like that because he knows that gets you branded as a lunatic and a bigot,” said Mantyla of Right Wing Watch.

And if the Grenell episode advanced the left’s perception of Fischer as a bigot, it did something more important, in Fischer’s view: It taught Mitt Romney a lesson. Fischer has been spoiling for a fight with Romney at least since last October, when Romney blasted Fischer’s “poisonous” speech — a line delivered with Romney’s characteristic ambiguity, and referring to Fischer’s speech about gays, Muslims, or Mormons, or any combination of the three.

But wasn’t the only Romney run-in at the summit, Fischer said. He was relaxing in the green room backstage, when, he said, he was unceremoniously booted from the room by Romney’s staff.

“Man, his team came in there, it was like Secret Service, I mean the guys with the buzz cuts,” Fischer said. “And they basically threw me out of there. They said, ‘We need to have everybody out of this hallway, we need everybody out of this green room. Nobody can be in there except for Governor Romney. So I was just kicked to the curb.’”

Because of that, Fischer has never interacted with Romney, but he said doesn’t hold a grudge, he says. “That’s just how he rolls.” (A Romney aide didn’t comment on the incident.)

More recently, Fischer was the unnamed subject of Romney advisor Eric Fehrnstrom’s criticism during an MSNBC appearance of “voices of intolerance” on the right.

“The question for Gov. Romney is this,” Fischer told BuzzFeed. “The Mormon Church teaches that homosexual acts are ‘sinful’ and ‘offensive to God.’ Is your church a ‘voice of intolerance?’”

Later on his show, after taking a call from a listener who wanted to debate whether or not Muslims and Christians worship the same god, Fischer returned to Romney, and considered the online magazine Salon’s recent contention that the Mississippi radio host is the Republican nominee’s “worst enemy.”

Fischer had a ready response: “I am the best friend he has in the world.”

Read the complete story and view video at Buzzfeed

Fischer: It’s Right That DOMA Discriminates Against Sodomy-Based Couples

Bryan Fischer Kicks Off Pride Month By Comparing Gays To Pedophiles And Rapists

Bryan Fischer, the public face of the certified anti-gay hate group, American Family Association, Friday on his radio program and in a companion op-ed said that DOMA rightly discriminates against couples who are in sodomy-based unions, and compared gay people to pedophiles and rapists. Fischer also placed gay people in the same category as prostitutes, adulterers, sexual harassers, thieves, drunk drivers, cannibals and zombies, mass murderers, embezzlers, and wife-beaters. Fischer thus proclaimed it is “time for conservatives to reclaim and rehabilitate the word ‘discriminate,’ particularly when it comes to homosexual behavior.”

(The American Family Association is the same group that brought you One Million Moms.)

On the radio, Fischer was attempting to take advantage of the start of gay pride month to pound home an op-ed he had written earlier that day on the American Family Association’s blog, which now has well over a dozen comments – almost all protesting Fischer’s anti-gay attacks.

The op-ed, “It’s altogether right to discriminate against homosexual behavior,” claims that the “left has twisted this word to create the utterly false impression that discrimination of any kind at any time for any reason is by definition wrong and immoral.”

In the video below, Fischer says conservatives should “rehabilitate the word ‘discriminate,’ that we reclaim it, that we dust it off, that we use it, unapologetically.”

In typical Maggie Gallagher fashion, Fischer then dives into his own bigotry and hatred, insisting it is good and right, and says, “I agree with the First Circuit Court of Appeals. DOMA discriminates against couples whose union is based on sodomy.”

The First Circuit did not use the term “sodomy,” by the way.

“Public policy is about discriminating against behaviors that are socially destructive and corrosive to the social fabric,” Fischer writes. “So, we rightly discriminate against people who rip off convenience stores, burgle houses, drive while drunk, eat the faces off homeless people, gun down servicemen on military bases, embezzle funds from employers or clients, or beat their wives.”

He adds:

We discriminate against adults, even priests, who have sex with children. We discriminate against teachers who have affairs with students. We discriminate against teachers who moonlight in the porn industry. We discriminate against students who engage in sexting. We discriminate against rapists. We discriminate against those who expose sexual partners unknowingly to the AIDS virus. We discriminate against those adults who commit statutory rape against minors. We discriminate against homosexuals and prostitutes by refusing to allow them to give blood.

The point is this: we discriminate against sexually immoral and inappropriate behavior all the time, and homosexual behavior is sexually immoral and inappropriate.

But fail to explain how, logically, gay people are included in these groups.

Curiously, Fischer it seems may have been told to tone down his attacks. He writes, “let’s be clear: nobody is talking about locking anybody up here.”

But Fischer has discussed locking up gay people, last year, and other times:

“But by the time of the founding until the late 20th Century, homosexual activity was a felony offense in the United States of America, there is no reason why it cannot be a criminal offense once again, absolutely none.”

Read the original story at The New Civil Rights Movement

ExxonMobil stockholders reject LGBT protections

Tico Almeida

ExxonMobil shareholders on Wednesday voted 80 percent to 20 percent against a resolution asking the company to explicitly protect lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender employees from discrimination.

“It is shameful that ExxonMobil forces its shareholders to push it to be an equitable employer,” said New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli, who lobbied for the resolution. New York State’s pension fund holds approximately 16.2 million shares of ExxonMobil stock with an estimated market value of $1.3 billion, according to a comptroller’s office news release.

“ExxonMobil is clearly acting in a discriminatory way when it offers different benefits to its employees based only on the company’s interpretation of legal marriage. It should do the right thing and implement a clear policy prohibiting discrimination. From the shareholders’ standpoint, there’s risk to the value of our investment until it does,” DiNapoli said. “I remain firmly committed to advocating for this resolution until ExxonMobil provides equality for all of its employees.”

Texas-based ExxonMobil has fought an explicit nondiscrimination policy for at least 10 years, according to Tico Almeida, president of Freedom to Work, a national group working to ban workplace discrimination against LGBT Americans.

“It’s a digging in of the heels by very stubborn people who want to latch on to the past,” Almeida told The Miami Herald on Wednesday.

The oil company posts on its website that “any form of discrimination by or toward employees, contractors, suppliers, and customers in any ExxonMobil workplace is strictly prohibited.

“Our global, zero-tolerance policy applies to all forms of discrimination, including discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity,” reads the policy.

ExxonMobil does not give domestic partner insurance benefits. Mobil employees lost the benefits after Exxon merged with the company in 1999.

Human Rights Campaign (HRC) gave ExxonMobil a negative score on its 2012 annual Corporate Equality Index.

“On HRC’s Corporate Equality Index, ExxonMobil received a score of -25. In contrast, oil and gas companies such as Chevron, BP, Shell, and Spectra received scores of 85 or higher,” according to an HRC news release. More information on the HRC Corporate Equality Index is available atwww.hrc.org/cei.

Rex W. Tillerson

Also Wednesday, ExxonMobil stockholders boosted Chairman and CEO Rex W. Tillerson’s compensation by 17 percent, according to an analysis by The Associated Press. In 2011, he earned $25.2 million. The combination of salary, stock awards and other compensation made Tillerson the 16th-highest paid executive among publicly traded U.S. companies last year.

Tillerson is also national president of Boy Scouts of America — which prohibits gays from being members or masters.

A scouts spokesman told The Herald it was unlikely the organization would change its policy, even as gay activists on Wednesday delivered 275,000 petitions demanding gays be admitted as members and masters.

Read the original story at Miami Herald

Tyler Clementi’s suicide: Best to look not only at Ravi, but at society at large

Dharun Ravi, the Rutgers student who notoriously used a webcam to spy on roommate Tyler Clementi’s same-sex sexual encounters in September 2010, was sentenced to 30 days in jail on Monday, May 21 for invasion of privacy and bias intimidation.

Clementi, as is well known, committed suicide shortly after the webcam incidents. What Ravi did was clearly inappropriate, and I am glad that he is being held responsible. However, while Ravi played a role in Clementi’s lack of well-being, our society as a whole also had a role. Ravi had his day in court, but we need to put our society on trial, as well.

Dharun Ravi

As a researcher on LGBT mental health, I have read study after study that has found an association between anti-LGB stigma and suicidality (see Bontempo and D’Augelli, 2002; Meyer, 1995; Rivers, 2004; and Warner et al., 2004, if you’re interested).

Likewise, the leading model of LGB mental health, Meyer’s minority stress theory, suggests that experiencing higher levels of stigma (e.g., homophobic attitudes and physical violence) generally leads to poorer mental health outcomes.

I don’t want to paint an overly simplistic picture, as various other factors ranging from internalized homophobia to availability of social support are also associated with mental health outcomes. But suffice to say, the existing body of mental health research suggests that experiencing anti-gay stigma helps to explain the high rates of suicide and other mental health problems in the LGBT population.

Ravi’s Twitter posts, webcam spying, and homophobic attitude were stigmatizing, and it is possible, as the news media have suggested, that these pushed Clementi to a tipping point.

But Clementi’s suicide did not happen in a bubble with only him and Ravi; it took place in a society in which homophobia is still rampant. It occurred in a society in which 85 percent of LGBT youth are verbally harassed and 41 percent are physically harassed each year, according to GLSEN’s 2009 National School Climate Survey. It occurred in a society in which many religious leaders and parents tell teenagers — both those who are out and those who are struggling in the closet — that being gay is a sin.

It occurred in a society in which there are few role models for LGBT youth; while there has been limited progress through such shows as Modern Family (though this only shows a white, upper-middle-class version of gayness), childrens’ and teens’ television shows and books feature references to nuclear families but steer clear of same-sex couples.

We need to put society on trial for its role in suicides such as Clementi’s.

We are better at holding influential figures responsible than we used to be — for instance, when Tracy Morgan went on a homophobic rant last year, he was widely criticized. But we haven’t really had a conversation about the role the whole village played in Clementi’s suicide and the countless others that have received less media attention.

Every time a parent expresses disapproval of homosexuality, every time a kid calls someone a “fag” at school, and every time people in conversations say gay is just a (negative) lifestyle choice, they are contributing to the stigma of being lesbian, gay, or bisexual, regardless of who they meant to direct their comments at.

The lack of public figures or role models for teenagers, and the hesitancy of schools to include same-sex sexualities in sex-ed curricula, despite these being a normal part of human sexuality, give these negative attitudes more influence by not contrasting them with the more positive reality. Given the body of mental health research that has consistently connected stigma and suicidality, and despite the progress we’ve made, the present state of society leaves me concerned.

We can’t know exactly what led Clementi to commit suicide, but while Ravi may have contributed to matters and certainly didn’t help them, it’s safe to assume that his actions were not the only contributing factor.

After all, had Ravi’s behavior occurred in a societal context that was otherwise 100-percent supportive of LGBT people, Clementi committing suicide in response to Ravi’s behavior seems unlikely. (It’s also worth pointing out that factors unrelated to one’s sexual orientation can contribute to depression and suicidality in LGBT people in the same way they do for the rest of the population.)

With society’s influence in mind, we should be evaluating how little, daily stigmatic events — ranging from name-calling at school to homophobia from the pulpit — accumulate, harming LGBT individuals (including those who are not out). And we should actively work to address these problems both head-on and by affirming the validity of all sexual orientations and gender identities.

We’re making progress. But every time a kid commits suicide at least in part because of anti-gay stigma, I remember that our society isn’t making progress nearly fast enough.

Read original story at LGBTQ Nation